20th November 2018
00:30
The fundamental question arises, time and time again. What are we, where are we and who we? The answers lie in various sources from manuscripts, holy texts, scientific journals, artistry, codex, manuscripts, mathematical and scientific formulae, philosophers, scholars, foreign languages, computer coding and these questions will be all addressed in a meaningful language all can understand, that can have the linguistic ability to understandeth.
Ye all can see, the first question is what are we. We are according to Biblical texts, more specifically Genesis 1:26 states "And God said, Let us make man in our image." The problem arises however is how much you take Biblical interpretation, from a pinch of salt to it being of absolute truth and nothing is wrong. The other supposed problems arise such as does God appear as a man, if so what man is this man, what is his appearance, what is his attributes, what is his standout features? I do not believe the Biblical texts are to set out this flawed dogmatism. On the opposing side, which can be just as controversial is the theory of evolution summed up in the text by Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species". The text that claimed we evolved from a common ancestor of primates. Yes, those two beliefs are diametrically opposed to each other with humans not coming up with a common conclusion, I take the controversial stance of we should take both into account as discussing more than one factor is a more logical approach. I believe there are more beliefs on creationism, atheism, agnosticism, religious views and otherwise but we do not have the time.
Where are we, the next question that seeks a logical understanding. Roughly we are 2000 years beyond Christ, 1500 years beyond Muhammad, 1000 years beyond William The Conqueror, 800 years beyond the Crusades, 500 years beyond Shakespeare, 200 years beyond the Victorians, 100 years beyond the Industrial Revolution, 70 years beyond World War Two, 55 years beyond the Beatles, 30 years beyond the fall of the Soviet Union and nearly 20 years beyond September 11th terror attacks in New York. Welcome to the 21st Century, we are at the cutting edge of technological advancements, we are in a new dawn of competing superpowers for different prospects. China for population and agriculture, Russia for land mass and gas and the United States for defence. The continued question is where does this lead us, in my theorem I believe there can only be two superpowers at one time and the established order is having an artificial duopoly between the United States and China that ends up in political and economic ping pong. While this happens Russia is being squished more and more with economic sanctions and controlling their military by aligning NATO up to the borders of Russia.
It is all a game of chess, we are the pawns, the countries have more providence and its a worldwide game. The chess pieces cannot go into checkmate although every day the ideals of checkmate get slowly closer and closer. The problem is when checkmate is put in action by X, Y or Z party things become stationary and therefore the world cannot run the established order therefore whether we like it or not chaos has to be erupted somewhere.
The final question is who are we, that is the most subjective of the lot, who are "we" there is no defined answer to we. We are slowly running ourselves into chaos although we cannot see the chaos, we are in a guise by superficial materialism, this is why our visions are crowded. We let money control our thoughts and beliefs, this is not a call to stop money. Although we need to think of the system about thinking of it in relation to money, therefore we should be able to break down the fundamental elements that hold up this house of cards. We can support lawful rebellions where things like were stated in Magna Carta around 800 years in the past.
We are the past.
We are the present.
We are the rebellion.
Monday, November 19, 2018
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
7th November 2018 @ 12:50
7th November 2018
12:50
We have discussed classical music here before, we have discussed how I am researching it more and more. We must understand that we are the revolution, the metaphysical, physical, practical, philosophical and the psychological. We must understand the logistics and harmonies as well as the human psychologies of the twenty first century man.
We as a collective have for too long accepted our twenty first century being, we have let the dialectics and the dogmatics of our era dominate our lives. We must look back to classical music in centuries gone by to find our soul, our inner being and our metaphysical patterns within our human cortex. We must listen to music that strikes emotion into our blood. We must rise, rise and rise. We must stand against our norms and realise we are going to move forward not backwards.
While we do this the twenty first century man will be cocooned out of his modern ethos and sprung into emotion of a great livelihood. The vandalism will then be art, the chaos will be ordered and the destruction will be the revolution. This process will be a gradual one, though we will revolt and deconstruct the chaotic false liberation fallacies within society and we will expose this on a grand stage.
The creation of a collective orchestra, the understanding that we will follow this new age, the new musical era of creation, radicalisation and reformation. We are standing as Martin Luther stood against the Catholic Church, as Lenin stood against the Romanov monarchy and we are standing against the destruction of our common era before the current destruction has indoctrinated us all as twenty first century beings.
Revolution, people. It can be done.
12:50
We have discussed classical music here before, we have discussed how I am researching it more and more. We must understand that we are the revolution, the metaphysical, physical, practical, philosophical and the psychological. We must understand the logistics and harmonies as well as the human psychologies of the twenty first century man.
We as a collective have for too long accepted our twenty first century being, we have let the dialectics and the dogmatics of our era dominate our lives. We must look back to classical music in centuries gone by to find our soul, our inner being and our metaphysical patterns within our human cortex. We must listen to music that strikes emotion into our blood. We must rise, rise and rise. We must stand against our norms and realise we are going to move forward not backwards.
While we do this the twenty first century man will be cocooned out of his modern ethos and sprung into emotion of a great livelihood. The vandalism will then be art, the chaos will be ordered and the destruction will be the revolution. This process will be a gradual one, though we will revolt and deconstruct the chaotic false liberation fallacies within society and we will expose this on a grand stage.
The creation of a collective orchestra, the understanding that we will follow this new age, the new musical era of creation, radicalisation and reformation. We are standing as Martin Luther stood against the Catholic Church, as Lenin stood against the Romanov monarchy and we are standing against the destruction of our common era before the current destruction has indoctrinated us all as twenty first century beings.
Revolution, people. It can be done.
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
7th November 2018 @ 01:40
7th November 2018
01:40
I always since childhood took fascination into the classical music, from a young child I can remember hearing Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings. I also remember Edward Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 1 it was always a pleasure hearing this building up to rise into a perfect melody. My late grandfather used to let me here these tunes through a small battery operated silver radio system.
As I grew older to my teenage years, I used to listen to Classic FM on my radio alarm clock. I read and listened to artists such as Johann Sebastian Bach, Johannes Brahms, Ludwig van Beethoven and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. I enjoyed a lot of piano and organ works and Beethoven's Ninth. These pieces I listened to on an iPod, while I did not study the field of music I was well aware of it. This was the great irony, I believed those who studied it studied it for studying sake and those who did not study it appreciated it more. Life shows you classical music was better than the crap of our common era. I remember having few people to discuss my fascination with.
I then started creating my iTunes and looking at a wide array of composers from the Baroque period, the Medieval period and of the 20th Century. These pieces where great, I added them to my iTunes. I listen to this day the occasional classical piece. I am taking a venture into the avant-garde. I share my interest with a good friend Thomas, whom studies music. The great thing is these music critiques of me and my friend can go on forever and ever. This is why I love this. We can analyse, scrutinize, speculate and examine to every last fraction, every note, every quaver.
01:40
I always since childhood took fascination into the classical music, from a young child I can remember hearing Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings. I also remember Edward Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 1 it was always a pleasure hearing this building up to rise into a perfect melody. My late grandfather used to let me here these tunes through a small battery operated silver radio system.
As I grew older to my teenage years, I used to listen to Classic FM on my radio alarm clock. I read and listened to artists such as Johann Sebastian Bach, Johannes Brahms, Ludwig van Beethoven and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. I enjoyed a lot of piano and organ works and Beethoven's Ninth. These pieces I listened to on an iPod, while I did not study the field of music I was well aware of it. This was the great irony, I believed those who studied it studied it for studying sake and those who did not study it appreciated it more. Life shows you classical music was better than the crap of our common era. I remember having few people to discuss my fascination with.
I then started creating my iTunes and looking at a wide array of composers from the Baroque period, the Medieval period and of the 20th Century. These pieces where great, I added them to my iTunes. I listen to this day the occasional classical piece. I am taking a venture into the avant-garde. I share my interest with a good friend Thomas, whom studies music. The great thing is these music critiques of me and my friend can go on forever and ever. This is why I love this. We can analyse, scrutinize, speculate and examine to every last fraction, every note, every quaver.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)